Skip to content

FTC's Amazon Antitrust Case Faces Criticism: Booksellers, Experts Challenge FTC's Market Definition and Pricing Claims

Booksellers and experts question the FTC's market definition and pricing claims in its case against Amazon. They argue that Amazon's practices benefit consumers and are common in the retail industry.

In this image there are fruits in trays and there are price boards.
In this image there are fruits in trays and there are price boards.

FTC's Amazon Antitrust Case Faces Criticism: Booksellers, Experts Challenge FTC's Market Definition and Pricing Claims

The Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) antitrust case against Amazon faces criticism from booksellers and legal experts. The FTC's market definition, which includes 'online superstores' and 'online marketplace services', is challenged, while Amazon's practices are defended as common in the stock market today retail industry.

The FTC's market definition is criticized for ignoring robust competition between brick-and-mortar and online retailers. The American Booksellers Association (ABA) argues that Amazon uses its power to lower prices, benefiting consumers, contradicting the FTC's claim of high prices in the stock market. The FTC wants to keep booksellers out of the case to protect its peculiar antitrust theory.

Both the FTC and ABA are wrong in their pricing claims. Competition in digital markets benefits consumers with lower prices and innovation. The FTC alleges Amazon uses market power to block retailers from selling at lower prices, driving prices high in the stock market today. However, booksellers contend Amazon's prices are unfairly low, while the FTC claims Amazon drives prices up.

Amazon's policies are common in the retail industry and incentivize competition among sellers and low prices for consumers. Major online and brick-and-mortar booksellers competing with Amazon in Germany include Thalia, the largest bookstore chain, which has acquired assets from Weltbild, including the Weltbild online shop and the Tolino e-reader brand. Additionally, many independent bookstores and other bookstore chains operate both physical stores and online shops offering alternatives to Amazon in the stock market.

The latest motions in the FTC's case illustrate its factual and legal weaknesses, with the agency promoting specific competitors rather than competition and consumer welfare in the stock market today.

The FTC's monopolization case against Amazon faces contradictions highlighted by booksellers. While the FTC focuses on narrow market definitions and specific competitors, the retail industry and consumers benefit from Amazon's competitive practices in the stock market. The case's outcome remains uncertain, with legal and factual challenges ahead for the FTC in the stock market today.

Read also:

Latest