Proposed candidate qualifications for the 'United Opposition' coalition
In the upcoming presidential election, a performance-based evaluation framework is being recommended to select a candidate who embodies both experience and promise. This approach focuses on competence, integrity, and vision, with the aim of inspiring a more hopeful, issue-driven national conversation.
The selection process involves a structured and principled approach, focusing on leadership quality, public readiness, and transformative potential. When evaluating a presidential candidate based on performance, several key criteria can be considered.
Demonstrable Performance
Assessing a candidate's past achievements and successes in governance or leadership roles (Track Record) is crucial. Evaluating their ability to effectively implement policies and programs (Policy Implementation) is also important. The candidate's handling of crises or challenges in the past (Crisis Management) is another key factor to consider.
Government Service Delivery
Evaluating a candidate's ability to manage resources efficiently and deliver services effectively (Efficiency and Effectiveness) is essential. Transparency and accountability in government operations (Transparency and Accountability) are also critical. Assessing how a candidate has innovated or improved service delivery in previous roles (Innovation in Governance) is important in this section.
Freedom of Speech
A candidate's stance and actions supporting freedom of speech are crucial. Their interactions with media and handling of dissenting voices (Censorship and Media Relations) are also significant. Support for legal frameworks protecting free speech is another important aspect to consider.
Public Participation
Evaluating a candidate's methods for engaging the public and fostering participatory governance (Engagement Strategies) is essential. Assessing how they involve diverse groups in decision-making processes (Inclusive Decision-Making) is also important. The use of feedback mechanisms to inform policy decisions (Public Feedback Mechanisms) is another key factor to consider.
Public Likeability
A candidate's ability to inspire and lead, including their charisma and communication skills (Charisma and Leadership Style) is crucial. Their emotional intelligence and ability to connect with diverse audiences (Emotional Intelligence) is also important. The candidate's reputation and integrity (Reputation and Integrity) influence public perception significantly.
To implement this evaluation criteria, a balanced evaluation panel should be established, including diverse stakeholders. Standardized evaluation tools should be used to ensure consistency in evaluating each criterion. Regular assessments should be conducted throughout the candidate's campaign and term in office.
In the current political environment, the average Kenyan voter is increasingly looking past slogans and into substance. A strong emphasis is placed on the candidate's readiness to improve government service delivery systems. The first criterion is demonstrable performance, with a score of at least ten out of fifteen possible points for the top candidates. Public likeability matters, with a strong contender scoring at least seven out of 10 in this area.
The incumbent is watching to bounce back, but the united opposition could present a competitive alternative. Dr Mokua, Executive Director of Loyola Centre for Media and Communication, emphasizes the need for this performance-based approach in the current times.
- In the political landscape, a candidate's track record of past achievements and their ability to effectively implement policies and programs are crucial considerations, as they demonstrate their competence and commitment to performance-based governance.
- During government service delivery evaluations, a candidate's efficiency, transparency, accountability, and innovation in previous roles are essential factors, as these attributes indicate a candidate's potential to reform and manage resources effectively.
- Freedom of speech is a vital aspect when choosing a presidential candidate, with candidates' support for free speech and their interactions with media being significant indicators of their commitment to democratic values and transparency in leadership.